Using Mobile Devices to Improve Speaking Fluency

Authors

  • Ramazan Güçlü Yozgat Bozok University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.15.02.18%20

Keywords:

Oral fluency, mobile devices, MALL, EFL learners

Abstract

Abstract

With recent advances in digital technologies and the ubiquitous use of mobile devices in daily life, effective oral practice outside the classroom is now a viable option for EFL learners. In line with Pegrum’s (2019) three mobilities framework, the present study reports on a group of EFL students who used their mobile devices (i.e., smartphones and tablets) to improve their speaking fluency beyond the classroom settings. More specifically, forty-four EFL students were asked to record a minimum of a two-minute speech each week outside the classroom over the course of 28 weeks. The analysis of the speech data and students’ perceptions of and experiences with the weekly speaking journal assignment carried out using mobile devices indicated that the EFL students achieved significant gains in fluency, which was measured by counting the number of words uttered per minute. Furthermore, students also acknowledged other advantages of this mobile oral practice in enhancing their self-confidence and decreasing speaking anxiety. The findings offer valuable implications for language learners and teachers, highlighting the fruitful effects of weekly mobile oral practice on the development of speaking fluency

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

References

Abdous, M. H., Camarena, M. M., & Facer, B. R. (2009). MALL technology: Use of academic podcasting in the foreign language classroom. ReCALL, 21(1), 76–95. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344009000020

Arevart, S., & Nation, P. (1991). Fluency improvement in a second language. RELC Journal, 22(1), 84-94. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829102200106

Burston, J. (2014). MALL: The pedagogical challenges. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(4), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.914539

Bygate, M. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 23–48). Pearson Longman.

Cavus, N., & Ibrahim, D. (2009). m-Learning: An experiment in using SMS to support learning new English language words. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00801.x

Chambers, F. (1997). What do we mean by fluency? System, 25(4), 535-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00046-8

Chen, Y., Carger, C. L., & Smith, T. J. (2017). Mobile-assisted narrative writing practice for young English language learners from a funds of knowledge approach. Language Learning & Technology, 21(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10125/44594

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative (4th edition). Prentice Hall.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

De Jong, N., & Perfetti, C. (2011) Fluency training in the ESL classroom: An experimental study of fluency development and proceduralization. Language Learning, 61(2), 533-568. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00620.x

DeKeyser, R. (2007). Introduction: Situating the concept of practice. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from Applied Linguistics and Cognitive Psychology (pp. 1-18). Cambridge University Press.

Ellis, R. (2009). The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 474–509. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp042

Fouz-González, J. (2017). Pronunciation instruction through Twitter: the case of commonly mispronounced words. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(7), 631–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1340309

Glesne, C. (2010). Becoming qualitative researchers (4th ed.). Pearson.

Grimshaw, J., & Cardoso, W. (2018). Activate space rats! Fluency development in a mobile game-assisted environment. Language Learning & Technology, 22(3), 159-175. https://doi.org/10125/44662

Gonulal, T. (2020). Improving listening skills with extensive listening using podcasts and vodcasts. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 7(1), 311-320. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.685196

Güneş, H., & Adnan, M. (2023). A Qualitative Inquiry Into Affordances and Challenges of Online Language Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Education, Technology and Science, 3(4), 1463-1497.

Alzieni, H. (2020). The impact of Mobile-Assisted language learning (MALL) in developing the listening skill: A case of students at Dubai Men’s College, the United Arab Emirates. In Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Proceedings of 2nd MEC TESOL Conference. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3798115

Hwang, W. Y., Shih, T. K., Ma, Z. H., Shadiev, R., & Chen, S. Y. (2016). Evaluating listening and speaking skills in a mobile game-based learning environment with situational contexts. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 639–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1016438

Jiang, M. Y. C., Jong, M. S. Y., Lau, W. W. F., Chai, C. S., & Wu, N. (2023). Exploring the effects of automatic speech recognition technology on oral accuracy and fluency in a flipped classroom. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39 (1), 125-140.

Keengwe, J., & Bhargava, M. (2014). Mobile learning and integration of mobile technologies in education. Education and Information Technologies, 19(4), 737-746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9250-3

Klimova, B. (2018). Mobile phones and/or smartphones and their apps for teaching English as a foreign language. Education and Information Technologies, 23(3), 1091-1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9655-5

Kim, S. (2014). Developing autonomous learning for oral proficiency using digital storytelling. Language Learning & Technology, 18(2), 20-35. https://doi.org/10125/44364

Kormos, J., & Dénes, M. (2004). Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System, 32(2), 145-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001

Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2009). Will mobile learning change language learning? ReCALL, 21(2), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344009000202

Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2012). Mobile-assisted language learning. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 3701-3709). Wiley.

Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(3), 271-289. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344008000335

Lan, Y. J., Sung, Y. T., & Chang, K. E. (2013). From particular to popular: Facilitating EFL mobile-supported cooperative reading. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 23–38. https://doi.org/10125/44335

Larson-Hall, J. (2016). Fluency awareness as a way to increase speaking ability in a first-year college level English class. Shiken, 20(1), 1-11.

Lenkaitis, C. A. (2020). Technology as a mediating tool: videoconferencing, L2 learning, and learner autonomy. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5-6), 483-509. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1572018

Lennon, P. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning, 40(3), 387-417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00669.x

Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

McCafferty, S. G. (1994). Adult second language learners’ use of private speech: A review of studies. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 421-436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02060.x

Metruk, R. (2024). Mobile-assisted language learning and pronunciation instruction: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 1-28.

Nation, P. (1989). Improving speaking fluency. System, 17(3), 377-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(89)90010-9

Nation, P., & Newton, J. (2008). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking. New York, NY: Routledge.

Ortega, L. (2013). Understanding second language acquisition. Routledge.

Pegrum, M. (2014). Mobile learning: Languages, literacies and cultures. Palgrave Macmillan.

Pegrum, M. (2016). Three agendas for MALL. In A. Palalas & M. Ally (Eds.), The international handbook of mobile-assisted language learning (pp. 86–112). Central Radio & TV University Press.

Pegrum, M. (2019). Mobile lenses on learning. Springer.

Phetsut, P., & Waemusa, Z. (2022). Effectiveness of Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL)-Based Intervention on Developing Thai EFL Learners' Oral Accuracy. International Journal of Technology in Education, 5(4), 571-585.

Rezaee, A. A., Alavi, S. M., & Razzaghifard, P. (2019). The impact of mobile-based dynamic assessment on improving EFL oral accuracy. Education and Information Technologies, 24(5), 3091-3105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09915-1

Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147-177. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.2.147

Segalowitz, N. (2010). The cognitive bases of second language fluency. Routledge.

Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047

Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2008). Complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis in task-based performance: A meta-analysis of the Ealing research. In S. Van Daele, A. Housen, F. Kuiken, M. Pierrard & I. Vedder (Eds.) Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language use, learning, and teaching. University of Brussels Press.

Tauroza, S. & Allison, D. (1990). Speech rates in British English. Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 90 –105. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.1.90

Tavakoli, P., Campbell, C., & McCormack, J. (2016). Development of speech fluency over a short period of time: Effects of pedagogic intervention. TESOL Quarterly, 50(2), 447-471. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.244

Tavakoli, P., & Hunter, A. M. (2018). Is fluency being ‘neglected’ in the classroom? Teacher understanding of fluency and related classroom practices. Language Teaching Research, 22(3), 330-349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817708462

Towell, R., Hawkins, R., & Bazergui, N. (1996). The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 84–119. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.1.84

Wang, S., & Smith, S. (2013). Reading and grammar learning through mobile phones. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 117–134. https://doi.org/10125/44342

Wood, D. (2001). In search of fluency: What is it and how can we teach it? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(4), 573-589. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.57.4.573

Wood, D. (2010). Formulaic language and second language speech fluency: Background, evidence and classroom applications. Bloomsbury.

Wrigglesworth, J., & Harvor, F. (2018). Making their own landscape: Smartphones and student designed language learning environments. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(4), 437-458. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1412986

Yoon, S. Y. (2015). The impact of voice journals on university students’ speaking skills in blended learning. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 18(4), 148-168. https://doi.org/10.15702/mall.2015.18.4.14

Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.1.1

Downloads

Published

2025-01-22

How to Cite

Güçlü, R. (2025). Using Mobile Devices to Improve Speaking Fluency. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.15.02.18