Factors influencing academic staff attitudes towards smart boards use in education process in Applied Science University in Jordan

Authors

  • Hadeel Saed
  • Amani Al-Refai Applied Science University
  • Duaa Aladwan
  • Mohammad Abu-Rahme
  • Eiad Alnajjar
  • Fadi Masalha
  • Iman Basheti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.14.01.03

Keywords:

Keywords: Factors Influencing Academic Staff, Attitudes, Smart Boards, Jordan.

Abstract

This research aims to study Factors Influencing Academic Staff Attitudes Towards Smart Boards Use in Education Process in Applied Science University. Additionally, it seeks to examine the moderating role of the type of school. The research’s independent variables consist of Factors (interaction, self-efficiency, course design, technical support, convenience and accessibility), while the dependent variable is Attitudes towards smart board. A quantitative method used The primary data was collected through academic staff university email and through whatsapp. A sample of (N=27) respondents, who are academic staff in Applied Science University. The result of this research confirms showed that there is a significant positive impact of the smart board on the attitudes of faculty members through positive interaction between them and students and educational materials. The result of interviews this research confirms   that the smart board supports the process of interaction between the lecturer and the students in one hand, and on the other hand, it supports the process of interaction between students and educational materials.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alaeddin AhmaD, PSUT, [email protected]

Jassim Al-Gasawneh, PSUT, [email protected]

Downloads

Published

2023-08-08

How to Cite

Saed, H., Al-Refai, A., Aladwan, D., Abu-Rahme, M., Alnajjar, E., Masalha, F., & Basheti, I. (2023). Factors influencing academic staff attitudes towards smart boards use in education process in Applied Science University in Jordan . Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 14(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.14.01.03

Issue

Section

Article