An assessment of job satisfaction among faculty members of the universities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.01.37Keywords:
Administration,, Dissatisfaction, Faculty members, Remuneration, TheoryAbstract
The research focused on job satisfaction among faculty members at the University of Liberia, Monrovia, Liberia. The objectives of the study included assessing the level of job satisfaction and dissatisfaction at the University of Liberia and identifying the factors of job dissatisfaction of the lecturers. The investigation was carried out using the quantitative approach. The respondents were given questionnaires as part of this. A wide range of diverse factors, such as impacts, attitudes, views, preferences, and behaviors, may be learned about using surveys. Surveys often offer a quite simple and effective way to acquire a lot of data (Graveter & Forzano, 2006). The major indicators used to do the assessment were based on the framework of the literature which will include: (a) the level of job satisfaction and dissatisfaction among the faculty members; (b) the factors responsible for the satisfaction and dissatisfaction. The researcher adopted a simple random sampling technique in selecting the required respondents for this research. It was found that job satisfaction is very poor among the members of the faculty of the University of Liberia and that the factors responsible for job dissatisfaction at the University of Liberia include low remuneration and poor general conditions as compared to those in administration and others in other sectors. It was recommended that the administration of the University of Liberia should increase the salaries of the faculty members in direct proportion to their qualifications and that the administration should improve the general working conditions of the faculty.
Downloads
References
Reference
N. Abdul Khaliq (1986). Work productivity and job happiness, Arabian Journal for Management, vol (1). N. Abu Sheikha (1998).
Arab Police Authorities Studies and Research Center, Naif Arab Academy. Job satisfaction of police officers M. Al-Sheikh and A. Shareer (2008).
Journal of Islamic Sciences, Series of Humanitarian Studies, vol. 1:
Job satisfaction and its association with some demographic factors among teachers (16). J. G. Bachman (1968).
Twelve liberal arts schools were used as the sample for this organizational research on faculty satisfaction and the dean's effect.
Journal of Practical 52(1p1), 55 in Psychology. Sharma, A., Bakhshi, A., Sharma, S., and Kumar (2008).
An examination of government and university lecturers found that job satisfaction predicts life satisfaction. Jammu's private colleges.
Association for Psycho-Cultural Research in Prachi, 24 (2). K. A. Bender and J. S. Heywood (2006).
High-achieving workers' job satisfaction: The impact of their gender, academic background, and income. 53(2), 253-279, Scottish Journal of Political Economy.
Perry, S. R., Liang, X., Stoller, E. P., Higgins, & Taylor; Bilimoria; D. (2006). How does work satisfaction differ between male and female faculty members?
The functions of mentorship and institutional leadership as well as their mechanisms for mediation.
31(3), 355–365, the Journal of Technology Transfer. J. Cano and J. X. Castillo (2004).
Factors that contribute to faculty members' work happiness. 45(3), 65–74.
Journal of Agricultural Education. Managing Service Quality, vol. 11(6), p. 389–401, Curry, A. (2001).
"Service Improvements in Public Services Using SERVQUAL." P. Deshwal (2011).
A study of those who influence India's future on job satisfaction. Global Conference on Management Innovations, London, UK. J. Enders (1997).
A status perspective on the academic profession in Europe. Cano, J.; Foor, R. M. (2011).
Job satisfaction indicators among a select group of agriculture faculty. Agricultural Education Journal, 52 (1). 43 A. Gargallo-Castel, J. Garca-Bernal, M. Marzo-Navarro, & P. Rivera-Torres (2005).
Empirical evidence of gender disparities in job satisfaction. 279–288 in Women in Management Review, 20(4). M. Gautama, K. Mandal, and R. S. Dalal (2006).
An examination of the job satisfaction of veterinary science professors. Age, 36(5.91), 0-92 Organizational commitment and work satisfaction at Islamic Azad University were examined in an interdisciplinary journal of contemporary research in a business article published in January 2012, Volume 3, Number 9.
Accreditation Council for Higher Education (2009).
Assurance of quality and accreditation for online education. 2002 CHEA Monograph Series (Vol. 1). DC, the capital. Woolliscroft, J. O., Quint, E. H., Lukacs, N. W., &Gyetko, M. R. Chung, K. C., Song, J. W., Kim, H. M. (2010).
Academic faculty job satisfaction predictors: Do instructional and clinical staff differ? 44(10):985–995 in Medical Education. Dr. D. S. Corbin and Dr. A. Ajamu (2000).
African American males at community college experience attrition. Arshad, M. Z., Mahmoud, & Khalid, S. (2012).
Comparative analysis of academic staff job satisfaction in Punjab, Pakistan's public and private universities. Journal of Business & Management International, 7 (1). Forzano, L.-A. B., and Gravette, F. J. (2009).
Techniques for doing behavioral science research. Wadsworth Center for Learning, Belmont, CA. Jennifer A. K. (2006),
The degree of work satisfaction among engineering professors of Chinese and Indian ancestry at a research-oriented university (Doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University). Usman, M., Manzoor, M. U., Naseem, M. A., and Shafiq, M. M. (2011).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.