Towards an optimal blended learning model during disrupted education periods
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.03.11Keywords:
Online Learning, Blended Learning, Constructivism, COVID-19 Pandemic, Learner AutonomyAbstract
This paper studies the application of online and blended learning models in the Arab learning settings to compensate the closures of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) including colleges and universities worldwide following the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak. The academic and educational institutions introduced online learning as an immediate alternative to complete academic semesters by offering courses via distance learning modes. However, the review of relevant literature, surveys, and studies showed that complete online learning does not bring the optimal results in the Arab learning settings at least. Surveys conducted in the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and other contexts revealed that complete online learning proved insufficient from the viewpoint of students, parents, and educators. Blended Learning Models (BLMs) are presented as a midway between full face-to-face and online instruction modalities. This study examines the different types and models of blended learning and how it is perceived by students in the Arab learning contexts. This review aims to set the features of developing an optimal model of blended learning and how it can be presented in the Arab learning settings, given the nature of the Arab students who believe that the role of a more knowledgeable individual like an instructor is necessary to facilitate acquisition and construction of knowledge. This study provides insights and pedagogical implications into how to apply an effective blended learning model to reinforce knowledge construction during disrupted education periods.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, A. & Ibrahim, A. (2019). Effects and students’ perspectives of blended learning on English into Arabic translation. Arab Journal of Applied Linguistics, 50-80.
Al-Ebaikan. (2010, September). Perceptions of blended learning in Saudi universities. University of Exeter. https://bit.ly/3HDEyKq
Anas, A. (2020). Perceptions of Saudi students to blended learning environments at the University of Bisha, Saudi Arabia. Arab World English Journal, 261-277.
Arasaratnam-Smith, L. & Northcote, M. (2017). Community in online higher education: Challenges and opportunities. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 12 (2): 188-198.
B.L.U. (2021, September). Blended learning models. Blended Learning Universe. https://bit.ly/3q7tmzK
BLM. (2021, April). Teaching in a smart lab. Blended Learning Models. https://bit.ly/3G958L2
Cai, R. & Wang, Q. (2020, March). A six-step online teaching method based on protocol-guided learning during the COVID-19 epidemic: A case study of the first middle school teaching practice in Changyuan City, Henan Province, China. Best Evidence in Chinese Education (BECE). https://bit.ly/2cG24P2
CommLab. (2020, July). What are synchronous and asynchronous e-learning? Online Learning. https://bit.ly/MYSDhQ
D'Agustino, S. (2021, May). Types of online learning. Fordham University. https://bit.ly/2bUNbrL
Edutopia. (2016, March). Which blended learning model is best for your classroom? Advancement Courses. https://bit.ly/3CGuEFF
Glossary. (2020, March). Online learning. TOP HAT. https://bit.ly/JU1C2j
Gordon, N. (2014, March). Flexible pedagogies: Technology-enhanced learning. The Higher Education Academy. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2052.5760
Horn, M. & Staker, H. (2011, May). The rise of K-12 blended learning. Innosight Institute. https://bit.ly/32X8Usw
Huang, R. L. (2020, March). Handbook on facilitating flexible learning during educational disruption: The Chinese experience in maintaining undisrupted learning in COVID-19 outbreak. UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education. https://bit.ly/31h2XpA
Hughes, C. (2020, April). Some implications of COVID‐19 for remote learning and the future of schooling. IBE‐UNESCO. https://bit.ly/2cFXDnm
Lee, M. & McLoughlin, C. (2010). Beyond distance and time constraints: Applying social networking tools and Web 2.0 approaches to distance learning. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.), Emerging Technologies in Distance Education (pp. 61-87). Edmonton, AB: Athabasca University Press.
Mahlangu, V. (2018, January). The good, the bad, and the ugly of distance learning in higher education. Trends in E-Learning. https://bit.ly/3fQ5ZEZ
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The Effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 1-47.
Priscila. (2021, September). Blended learning: The best of both worlds? Advantages and disadvantages. Easy LMS. https://bit.ly/3F9vHi1
Schleicher, A. (2020, May). Teaching in the United Arab Emirates: 10 lesson from TALIS. OECD: https://bit.ly/3FW8pxc
Stauffer, B. (2020, April). What’s the difference between online learning and distance learning? Applied Educational Systems. https://bit.ly/JUeF3N
TRA. (2021, May). Online poll on remote education. Trends Research & Advisory. https://trendsresearch.org/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.