The Evaluation of Research-based Learning on ‘Moodle’ Learning Management System Using CIPP Models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.04.18Keywords:
Distance learning, research-based learning, CIPP model, LMS MoodleAbstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of research-based learning conducted remotely through the use of the Moodle learning management system using the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) evaluation model. Data sources include lecturers, students, faculty documents, study program materials, and Moodle learning management systems (LMS) used in lectures. Data were gathered using the CIPP evaluation checklist (2002), semi-structured interviews, document analysis, and observation. The data were analyzed using content analysis. The findings indicate that learning occurs entirely within the Moodle LMS, which includes lecture tools, is guided by lecturers with subject-specific expertise, is collaborative within the lecture system, and is conducted using appropriate and effective virtual synchronous and self-directed asynchronous learning approaches. Additionally, employing various approaches and learning strategies has a major influence on students' abilities, attitudes, behaviors, and values when it comes to developing educational research and writing a quantitative research proposal. However, because proposal assignments are often assigned towards the program's ending, the time necessary to complete them is typically quick. This looks to be an omission of certain students' abilities. Slow learners will fall behind on these assignments.
Keywords: Distance learning, research-based learning, CIPP model, LMS Moodle.
Downloads
References
Al-ani, W. (2015). Blended Learning Approach Using Moodle and Student’s Achievement at Sultan Qaboos University in Oman. Journal of Education and Learning, 2(3), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v2n3p96
Amadea, K., & Ayuningtyas, M. D. (2020). Perbandingan efektivitas pembelajaran sinkronus dan asinkronus pada materi program linear. Jurnal PRIMATIKA, 9(2), 111–120.
Asadi, M., Akbari, R., & Samar, R. G. (2016). Program Evaluation of the New English Textbook ( Prospect 1 ) in the Iranian Ministry of Education. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(2), 291–301. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0602.10
Aziz, S., Mahmood, M., & Rehmen, Z. (2018). Implementation of CIPP Model for Quality Evaluation at School Level: A Case Study. Journal of Educational and Educational Development, 5(1), 189–206.
Burdina, G. M., Krapotkina, I. E., & Nasyrova, L. G. (2019). Distance Learning in Elementary School Classrooms: An Emerging Framework for Contemporary Practice. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1–16.
Conrad, D., & Openo, J. (2018). Assessment strategies for online learning: Engagement and authenticity. AU Press. https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781771992329.01
Darassalam, G. (2010). Program evaluation in higher education. The International Journal of Research, 3(4), 56–65.
Darodjat, & Muhammad, W. (2015). Model evaluasi program pendidikan. Islamadina, 14(1), 1–28.
Dewy, M. S., Ganefri, & Kusumaningrum, I. (2016). Pengembangan model pembelajaran berbasis produk pada mata kuliah praktik elektronika daya. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Teknik Elektro, 1(1), 15–28.
Divayana, D. G. H., Heryanda, K. K., & Suyasa, P. W. A. (2020). Pemberdayaan pembelajaran synchronous dan asynchronous berbasis nilai-nilai aneka dalam upayA. Proceeding Senadimas Undiksha 2020 |, 2016, 307–316.
Eseryel, D. (2002). Approaches to evaluation of training: Theory & practice. Educational Technology & Society, 5(2), 93–99.
Fahmi, M. H. (2020). Komunikasi synchronous dan asynchronous dalam e-learning pada masa pandemic covid-19. Jurnal Nomosleca, 6(2), 146–158.
Fahruddin. (2020). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran Sejarah Menggunakan Model Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP). HISTORIA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah, 8(2), 199–211.
Garad, A., Al-Ansi, A. M., & Qamari, I. N. (2021). The role of e-learning infrastructure and cognitive competence in distance learning effectiveness during the covid-19 pandemic. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i1.33474
Griffith Institute for Higher Education (GIHE). (2008). Research-based learning : strategies for successfully linking teaching and research. University of Griffith.
Herbimo, W. (2021). Penerapan aplikasi moodle sebagai salah satu model application of the moodle application as one of the distance. Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 5(1), 107–113.
Ijrish, H. H. F. Al, & Shubber, A. H. (2018). Effectiveness of moodle system on the achievement of a course among the history departement students. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 13(22), 9760–9767.
Knott, H. (2020). Assessment strategies for online learning: Engagement and authenticity. In Distance Education (Vol. 00, Issue 00). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1821608
Kromrey, J. D., Florida, S., Hess, M. R., & Florida, S. (2005). A Comprehensive System For The Evaluation Of Innovative Online Instruction At A Research University: Foundations, Components, And Effectiveness. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 2(6), 1–10.
Kurniasari, A., Pribowo, F. S. P., & Putra, D. A. (2020). Analisis efektivitas pelaksanaan belajar dari rumah (bdr) selama pandemi covid-19. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dasar: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dan Hasil Penelitian, 6(3), 101–108.
Kurniawan, P. W., Zulianti, H., & Narulita, S. (2020). Pendampingan pembelajaran daring melalui aplikasi google meet bagi guru di sma adiguna bandar lampung Putut. Adiguna: Jurnal Pengabdian Dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, 5(2), 3–6.
Lou, Y. (2004). Learning to solve complex problems through between-group collaboration in project-based online courses. Distance Education, 25(1), 49–66.
Purba, N. A., & Sitanggang, S. (2021). Sosialisasi penggunaan aplikasi google meet bagi guru-guru sd negeri 091396 huta bayu pane kabupaten simalungun. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Nommensen Siantar, 1(2), 70–75.
Rizal, S., & Walidain, B. (2019). Pembuatan media pembelajaran e-learning berbasis moodle pada matakuliah pengantar aplikasi komputer universitas serambi mekkah. Jurnal Ilmiah DIDAKTIKA, 19(2), 178–192.
Sadeghi, M. (2019). A Shift from classroom to Distance LEarning: Advantages and Limitations. International Journal of Research in English Education, 4(1), 80–88.
Sari, A. P., Baedhowi, & Indrawati, C. D. S. (2017). The Use of Learning Media with MOODLE Approach to Improve the Quality of Education: A Literature Study. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 158(1), 54–59.
Sergio, A., Penedo, T., & Pereira, V. S. (2018). Distance education: advantages and disadvantages of the point of view of education and society. Dialogia, 29(1), 139–144. https://doi.org/10.5585/dialogia.N29.7661
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models, and applications. John Willey & Sons.
Stufflebeam, Daniel L. (2017). CIPP Evaluation Model Checklist : A Tool for Applying the CIPP Model to Assess Projects and Programs. Western Michigan University Press.
Syauqi, K., Munadi, S., & Triyono, M. B. (2020). Students’ perceptions toward vocational education on online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 9(4), 881–886. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20766
Tokmak, H. S., Baturay, H. M., & Fadde, P. (2013). Applying the Context, Input, Process, Product Evaluation Model for Evaluation, Research, and Redesign of an Online Master’s Program. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(3), 273–293.
Wijaya, H., Supartini, T., Sumule, L., Weismann, I. T. J., & Tari, E. (2021). Online Learning Evaluation in Higher Education : Study Survey Method. Journal of Education Technology, 5(3), 401–408.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
