The effectiveness open-ended learning and creative problem solving models to improve creative thinking skills
Keywords:Open-ended learning, creative problem solving, direct instruction, creative thinking skill
Creative thinking skills are part of globalization era education and can be applied by implementing innovative learning models. This study aims to identify the effectiveness of the open-ended learning and creative problem solving models to improve students' creative thinking skills on learning mathematics in elementary school. A quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental method is used in this study. The study was conducted in Surakarta, Indonesia, and involved 270 fourth grade elementary school students. Data collection is done by disseminating the test instrument. The analysis is done by testing the hypothesis and comparison test. Based on the test results, it is known that the observation test value is 32.79 or greater than the critical area of 3.02. Thus, the open ended learning and creative problem solving learning model affects creative thinking skills. In the comparative test, the open ended learning model is more effective than the creative problem solving and direct instruction models, and the creative problem solving learning model is more effective than the direct instruction model. These findings can be used as a guide for teachers to apply open learning models for their learning or creative problem solving models that are proven to affect creative thinking skills.
Atun, S., & Latupeirisa, V. P. S. (2021). Science KIT teaching aid for the earthquake in improving students’ collaboration skills and creative thinking in junior high school. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.10.1.187
Bardach, L., & Klassen, R. M. (2020). Smart teachers, successful students? A systematic review of the literature on teachers’ cognitive abilities and teacher effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 30(100312).
Budiyono. (2017). Statistika untuk penelitian [Statistics for research]. UNS Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods (p. 273). Sage Publication.
Dewanto, W. K., Agustianto, K., & Sari, B. E. (2018). Developing thinking skill system for modelling creative thinking and critical thinking of vocational high school student. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 953(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/953/1/012115
Doncieux, S., Filliat, D., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Hospedales, T., Duro, R., Coninx, A., Roijers, Di. M., Girard, B., Perrin, N., & Sigaud, O. (2018). Open-ended learning: A conceptual framework based on representational redescription. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 12(SEP), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2018.00059
ElAdl, A. M., & Polpol, Y. S. (2020). The effect of self-regulated learning strategies on developing creative problem solving and academic self-efficacy among intellectually superior high school students. International Journal of Psycho-Educational Sciences, 9(1), 97–106. https://www.journals.lapub.co.uk/index.php/IJPES
Emara, M., Rajendran, R., Biswas, G., Okasha, M., & Elbanna, A. A. (2018). Do students’ learning behaviors differ when they collaborate in open-ended learning environments? Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2(CSCW). https://doi.org/10.1145/3274318
Fauziah, M., Marmoah, S., Murwaningsih, T., & Saddhono, K. (2020a). Profile of divergent thinking ability of elementary school student in thematic learning. Elementary Education Online, 19(2), 624–640. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.693109
Fauziah, M., Marmoah, S., Murwaningsih, T., & Saddhono, K. (2020b). The effect of thinking actively in a social context and creative problem-solving learning models on divergent-thinking skills viewed from adversity quotient. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 537–568. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.537
Gilakjani. (2011). The effect of visual, auditory, and kinaesthetic learning styles. Journal International Conference on Social Science and Humanity, 5.
Hafidzah, N. A., Azis, Z., & Irvan, I. (2021). The effect of open ended approach on problem solving ability and learning independence in students’ mathematics lessons. IJEMS:Indonesian Journal of Education and Mathematical Science, 2(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.30596/ijems.v2i1.6176
Hannula, J. (2019). Characteristics of teacher knowledge produced by pre-service mathematics teachers: The case of open-ended problem-based learning. Lumat, 7(3), 55–83. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.7.3.391
Heliawati, L. (2021). Creative problem-solving learning through open-ended experiment for students ’ understanding and scientific work using online learning. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 321–336.
Hidayat, R., Habibi, A., Mohd Saad, M. R., Mukminin, A., & Wan Idris, W. I. Bin. (2018). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of PERMA for indonesian students in mathematics education programmes. Pedagogika, 132(4), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2018.132.9
Khairuddin. (2014). The influence of modified games and conventional learning models on the physical fitness of junior high school students. Asian Social Science, 10(5), 136–140. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n5p136
Li, Y., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2019). Problematizing teaching and learning mathematics as “given” in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0197-9
Lukman, A. A. (2017). The difference of learning model Think-Talk -Write (TTW) and conventional learning model in improving students critical thinking skills in sociology subject. International Research Journal of Education and Sciences, 1(2), 21–24.
Montag-Smit, T., & Maertz, C. P. (2017). Searching outside the box in creative problem solving: The role of creative thinking skills and domain knowledge. Journal of Business Research, 81(July), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.07.021
Murwaningsih, T., & Fauziah, M. (2020). The effectiveness of Creative Problem Solving (CPS) learning model on divergent thinking skills. International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series, 4(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v4i1.49460
Ndiung, S., Dantes, N., Ardana, I. M., & Marhaeni, A. A. I. N. (2019). Treffinger creative learning model with RME principles on creative thinking skill by considering numerical ability. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 731–744. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12344a
Nonthamand, N., & Songkhla, J. N. (2018). The correlation of open learning, collaboration, learning tools, and creative problem solving by graduate students in Thailand. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(9), 280–289. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i09.7835
Nurhayati, & Karyati. (2016). The effectiveness of the collaborative learning model on Trigonometry topic of senior high school student graduate x using open-ended approach. Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 13–17.
Petrulytė, A., Navaitienė, J., & Rimienė, V. (2020). The relationships of problem-solving, anger expression and control, self-reflection and insight of prospective and in-service teachers. Pedagogika, 139(3), 88–110. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2020.139.5
Rais, M., Yahya, M., Jamaluddin, & Purnamawati. (2021). Comparing project-based learning and problem-based learning to foster 21st-century learning skills in agricultural seaweed product. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(3), 1217–1230.
Rogers, A. S. C. (2021). Student perceptions of open-ended learning experiences in writing instruction. California State University San Marcos.
Shimada. (2017). The open ended approach: A new proposal for teaching mathematics. NCTM.
Sompong, N. (2018). Learning management system for creative thinking skill development with collaborative learning of the graduate students in Kasetsart University. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 13(6), 527–532. http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2003-02671-0080
Sulistiyarini, A., Sukarno, & Triyanto. (2020). The impact of reading activity before lesson on creative thinking skill. 3rd International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education (ICLIQE 2019) The, 397, 593–601. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200129.074
Sya’Roni, A. R., Inawati, P. A., Guswanto, E., Susanto, & Hobri. (2020). Students’ creative thinking skill in the flipped classroom-blended learning of mathematics based on lesson study for learning community. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1563(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1563/1/012046
Tanjung, D. F., Syahputra, E., & Irvan, I. (2020). Problem based learning, discovery learning, and open ended models: An experiment on mathematical problem solving ability. Jurnal Teori Dan Aplikasi Matematika, 4(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v4i1.1736
Titikusumawati, E., Sa’dijah, C., As’ari, A. R., & Susanto, H. (2019). An analysis of students’ creative thinking skill in creating open-ended mathematics problems through semi-structured problem posing. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1227(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1227/1/012024
Triwibowo, Z., Dwidayati, N. K., & Sugiman. (2017). Analysis of mathematical creative thinking ability viewed from students learning styles in seventh grader through treffinger learning model with open-ended approach. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(3), 391–399. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v6i3.17987
VanderStoep, S. W., & Johnston, D. D. (2009). Research methods for everyday life: blending qualitative and quantitative approaches. Jossey Bass.
Yosopranata, D., Zaenuri, & Mashuri. (2018). Mathematical connection ability on creative problem solving with ethnomathematics nuance learning model. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 7(2), 108–113. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v7i2.25399
Yuliana, R., Utomo, D. P., & Ismail, A. D. (2019). The effectiveness of creative problem-solving learning model in mathematics learning. Mathematics Education Journal, 3(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.22219/mej.v3i1.8421
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.