The Relationship between distributed leadership practices and academic optimism among faculty members in Northern Border University
The current study aimed to explore the relationship between distributed leadership practices (DLP) and academic optimism (AO) among faculty members, to identify the predictive validity of distributed leadership dimensions of academic optimism, and to identify the effects of gender in DLP and AO. DLP scale and AO scale were used as the instruments for the study. For the data analysis, Pearson’s correlation, multiple regression analyses, and paired sample t-test were used. The results showed that there is a significant positive correlation between DLP and AO. Available leadership opportunity was the best predictor to AO. There were not any significant differences between males and females in DLP and AO.
Adams, S., (2004). The relationships among adult attachment, general self-disclosure, and perceived organizational trust. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28 (2), 117-148.
Barnett, R. 2011. Being a University. Oxford: Routledge.
Bennett, N., Harvey, J., & Woods, P. (2003). Desk study of distributed leadership. NCSL/CEPAM, Nottingham.
Blomqvist, K. & Stahle, P. (1999). Building organizational trust.Telecom Business Research Center, Lappeenranta University of Technology and Sonera Research, Finland.
Bryk, A. S. & Schneider, B. (2002).Trust in schools: A Core resource for improvement. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY.
Bryk, A., Camburn, E. & Louis, K.S. (1999). Professional community in Chicago elementary schools: Facilitating factors and organizational consequences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 751–781.
Bryman, A. (2009). Effective Leadership in Higher Education. London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.
Butler, J. K. & Cantrell, R.S. (1984).A behavioural decision theory to modelling dyadic trust in supervisors and subordinates.Psychological Reports, 55, 9-28.
Chang, C. (1996). The research of elementary school teachers’ efficacy: Different teaching efficacy beliefs, type of teaching performance and teaching productivity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Taiwan.
Chang, H. (2011) A study of the relationships between distributed leadership, teacher academic optimism and student achievement in Taiwanese elementary schools. School Leadership & Management, 31 (5), 491-515.
Chen, C., & Cheng, S. (2008). The related research of cultured capital and learning achievement: Based on the 6 grades of elementary school in Yunlin County. Journal of NHCUE, 25 (1), 7998.
Chin, M., & Wu, C. (2009). The relation research of junior high school teacher obligation, organization health and school effectiveness. Journal of Education and Psychology, 32 (1), 1-28.
Chin, M., & Wu, C. (2010).The relation research of junior high school principal leadership transition, organization health and effectiveness: The verification of middle effective mode. Contemporary Educational Research, 17 (3), 83-124.
Chin, M., C. Wu, & Deng.C. (2007). The construction and measurement of junior high school organization health level. Educational Policy Forum, 10 (3), 75-102.
Chu, W., & Yeh, Y. (2003). The impacted factor investigation of trainee teachers’ faith changing. Journal of NTCU, 48 (1), 41-66.
Creanor, L. (2014). Raising the profile: An institutional case study of embedding scholarship and innovation through distributive leadership. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51 (6), 573–583.
Firestone, W. A. & Martinez, M. C. (2007). Districts, teacher leaders, and distributed leadership: changing instructional practice. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6 (1), 3-35.
Fletcher, J. K., & Kaufer, K. (2003). Shared leadership: Paradox and possibility. In C. J. Pearce and C. Conger (Eds) Shared leadership: Reframing the how and whys of leadership (pp.21-47). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk, A. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and effect on student achievement. American Education Research Journal, 37 (2), 479-507.
Goddard, R. D., Sweetland, S. R., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). Academic emphasis of urban elementary schools and student achievement in reading and mathematics: a multilevel analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36, 683-703.
Goddard, R. D., Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2001). A multilevel examination of the distribution and effects of teacher trust in students and parents in urban elementary schools.The Elementary School Journal, 102 (1), 3-17.
Goddard, R.D., Hoy, W.K., & Woolfolk, A. (2004). Collective efficacy: Theoretical developments, empirical evidence, and future directions. Educational Researcher, 33 (3), 313-322.
Gronn, P. ( 2003). Leadership: Who needs it? School Leadership and Management, 23 (3), 267-290.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (1996). The principal’s role in school effectiveness: an assessment of methodological progress, 1980-1995. In Leithwood, K. and Hallinger, P. (Eds), International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration, (pp. 723-83). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hammersley-Fletcher, L., & Brundrett. M. (2005). Leaders on leadership: The impressions of primary school head-teachers and subject leaders. School Leadership and Management, 25 (1), 59-75.
Harkin, D.G. & Healy, A.H. (2013). Redefining and leading the academic discipline in Australian universities. Australian Universities’ Review, 55 (2), 80–92.
Harris, A. (2008).Distributive leadership: According to the evidence. Journal of Education Administration, 46 (2), 172-188.
Hasanvand, M.M., Zeinabadi, H.R., Shomami, M.A., & Karfestani, Z.J. (2013).The Study of Relationship Between Distributed Leadership and Academic Optimism in High Schools of Iran. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7 (7), 623-630.
Ho, T. (2009). The structural relation research of elementary school teachers’ faith, leadership behavior, class operation strategy and effectiveness. Journal of NTCU: Educational Class, 23 (1), 99-127.
Hoy, W. & Tarter, J. (1992). “Measuring the health of the school climate: a conceptual framework”. NAASP Bulletin, November (pp. 74-90).
Hoy, W. K. & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2007). The conceptualization and measurement of faculty trust in schools. Essential ideas for the reforms of American schools. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Press.
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2008). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hoy, W.K. & Tschannen-Moran, M. (1999). The five faces of trust: An empirical confirmation in urban elementary schools. Journal of School Leadership, 9, 184-208.
Hoy, W.K., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2003). The conceptualization and measurement of faculty trust in schools: The omnibus T-Scale.In Studies in leading and organizing schools, W.K. Hoy and C.G. Miskel (Eds.), 181208. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Hoy, W.K., Tarter, C.J. & Kottkamp, R. B. (1991).Open schools/healthy schools: Measuring organizational climate. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Hoy, W.K., Tarter, C.J. & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2006), Academic optimism of schools: a force for student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 43 (3), 425-446.
Hoy, W.K., Tarter, C.J. & Woolfolk-Hoy. A. (2006a). Academic optimism of school: A force for student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 43 (3), 425-467.
Hoy, W.K., C.J. Tarter, & A. Woolfolk-Hoy. (2006b).. Academic optimism: A second order confirmatory analysis. In W.K. Hoy and C.G. Miskel (Eds.) Contemporary issues in educational policy and school outcomes (pp.135-49). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Hsieh, C. (2010). International excellent principle leadership: The key learning leadership behavior. Journal of Education Research, 191, 28-38.
Huang, T. (2008).School leadership: New theory and practice. Taipei, Taiwan: Wunan.
Jones, S., Harvey, M. & Lefoe, G. (2014a). A conceptual approach for blended leadership for tertiary education institutions. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36 (4), 418–429.
Jones, S., Harvey, M., Lefoe, G. & Ryland, K. (2014b). Synthesizing theory and practice: Distributed leadership in higher education. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42 (5), 603–619.
Jones, S., Lefoe, G., Harvey, M. & Ryland, K. (2012) Distributed leadership: A collaborative framework for academics, executives and professionals in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 34 (1), 67–78.
Judson, E. (2006). How teachers integrate technology and their beliefs about learning: Is there a connection? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14 (3), 581-597.
Kösterelioğlu, M.A. (2017). The effect of teachers' shared leadership perception on academic optimism and organizational citizenship behavior: a Turkish case. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20 (2), 246-258, DOI:10.1080/13603124.2015.1066868
Lee, V. E., Dedrick, R.F. & Smith, J.B. (1991). The effect of the social organization of schools on teachers’ efficacy and satisfaction. Sociology of Education, 64 (3), 190- 208.
Leithwood, K. & Jantzi, D. (2000), “The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement”.Journal of Educational Administration, 38 (2), 112-29.
Leithwood, K. (2006). Teacher working conditions that matter: evidence for change. Toronto: Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario.
Leithwood, K., & Riehl, C. (2003). What we know about successful school leadership. Philadelphia: Temple University.
Leithwood, K., Louis, K., Anderson, S. & Wahlstrom, K. (2004).How Leadership Influences Student Learning: A Review of Research for the Learning from Leadership Project. The Wallace Foundation, New York, NY
Lewicki, R., McAllister, D., & Bies, R. (1998). Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review, 23 (3), 438-458.
Li, Y., Chiang, F. & Chiao, L. (2010). The related research of elementary school principal leadership behavior, atmosphere and learning achievement. Journal of Education Research, 191, 39-54.
Lin, C. (2007). The relationship among parents’ achievement orientation, teachers’ expectations of vocational students’ achievement goals and learning achievement. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3 (2), 37-53.
Liu, S., & Lin, Q. (2007).The research of junior high school teachers’ class operation and students’ motivation. Counseling and Consulting Journal, 29 (1), 1-24.
Love, A., & Kruger. A.C. (2005).Teacher beliefs and student achievement in urban schools serving African American students. Journal of Educational Research, 99 (2), 87-98.
Lumby, j. (2003). Distributed leadership in colleges leading or misleading? Educational Management & Administration, 31 (3), 283-293.
Malloy, J. P. (2012). Effects of distributed leadership on teachers’ academic optimism and student achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Canada.
Mascal, B., Leithwood, K. Straus, T. & Sacks, R. (2008).The relationship between distributed leadership and teachers’ academic optimism. Journal of Educational Administration, 46 (2), 214-228.
Mayrowetz, D. (2008). Making sense of distributed leadership: exploring the multiple usages of the concept in the field. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44 (3), 424-435.
Mifsud, D. (2016). Distribution dilemmas: Exploring the presence of a tension between democracy and autocracy within a distributed leadership scenario. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. Retrieved July 28, 2017 from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/174114321 6653974.
Mishra, A.K. (1996). Organizational Responses to Crisis: The Centrality of Trust. In R. Kramer & T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ou, Y. (2006). The relation research of high grade students’ perception in elementary school of the teaching style, learning satisfaction and learning achievement. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Taiwan.
Pajares, M.F. (1992).Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62 (3), 307-332.
Pearce, C.J., & Conger.C. ( 2003). Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ross, J.A., Hogaboam-Gray, A. & Gray, P. (2004).“Prior student achievement, collaborative school processes and collective teacher efficacy”. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(3), 163-88.
Rotter, J. B. (1967).A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35, 651-665.
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23 (3), 393-404.
Shi, S. (2003).The impacts of target setting and peer comparison on children’s self-efficacy and division learning performance. Journal of NTTC, 16 (2), 139-160.
Silins, H. & Mulford, W. (2002). Leadership and school results, In Leithwood, K. and Hallinger, P. (Eds), Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership (pp. 561-612). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
Spillane, J.P., Camburn, E. M., & Stitziel Pareja. A. (2007). Taking a distributed perspective to the school principal’s work day. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6 (1), 103-125.
Spillane, J.P., Halverson, R. & Diamond., J., B. (2007). Towards a theory of leadership practice: a distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36 (1), 3-34.
Storey, J. (2004).Changing theories of leadership and leadership development. In J. Storey (Ed.) Leadership in organizations: Current issues and key trends. London: Routledge.
Sun, M., & Wang.C. ( 2007). The relation investigation of teaching way and students’ motivation in junior high school. National Education Research Journal, 18, 165-193.
Tian, M., Risku, M. & Collin, K. (2016). A meta-analysis of distributed leadership from 2002 to 2013: Theory development, empirical evidence and future research focus. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44 (1), 146–164.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Barr, M. (2004).Fostering student learning: The relationship of collective teacher efficacy and student achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3 (3), 189-209. doi: 10.1080/15700760490503706516
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Gareis, C. (2015). Faculty trust in the principal: An essential ingredient in high-performing schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 53 (1), 66-92.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2000).A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70 (4), 547–593.
Tschannen-Moran, M., Salloum, S. J., & Goddard, R. D. (2014). Context matters: The influence of collective beliefs on shared norms. In H. Fives & M. G. Gill (Eds.) International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs (pp.301-316). New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A. & Hoy, W.K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68 (2), 202-248.
Vuori, J. (2017). Distributed leadership in the construction of a new higher education campus and community. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 1-17.
Wahlstrom, K. & Louis, K. (2008). How teachers experience principal leadership: the roles of professional community, trust, efficacy and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44 (4), 458-495
Wallace Foundation, (2011). The school principal as leader: guiding schools to better teaching and learning Retrieved from http://www.wallacefoundation.org.
Wan, S. (2014). Distributed leadership practices in Hong Kong higher education: Hong Kong academics' perceptions and practices. Paper presented at the HERDSA 2014 Conference, HKBU, HK, 8th July 2014.
Weng, F. (2006). The affected social factors comparison analysis of learning achievement. Bulletin of the National Institute of Education Resources and Research, 32, 23_39.
Woods, P. A., N. Bennett, J. A. Harvey, and C. Wise. (2004). "Variabilities and Dualities in Distributed Leadership." Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 32 (4), 439-457.
Woods, P.A. (2015). Distributed leadership for equity and learning. RevistaLusófona de Educação, 30, 175-187.
How to Cite
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.