The relationship between metacognitive awareness and online information searching strategies

  • Fatma Gizem Karaoğlan Yılmaz Bartın University
Keywords: University students, Metacognitive awareness, Online searching strategies

Abstract

The aim of this study is to look into the relationship between undergraduate students' metacognitive awareness (MA) and their online information searching strategies (OISS). Mixed method was used in the study. The participants involved 419 undergraduate students. The data in the study were collected using OISS Inventory, MA Inventory and student interview forms. The results indicate that students' level of MA and their OISS are developed. The results of correlation analysis reveal that there is a positive and significant level of relationship between OISS and MA variables at a medium level. When the qualitative findings are examined, it is seen that in planning process students mostly determine key words, and in monitoring and evaluation processes they compare the accessed information with searching goals. In the discussion section of the study, how MA could be used to improve students' OISS is discussed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akın, A., Abacı, R., & Çetin, B. (2007). The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the metacognitive awareness inventory. Educational Science: Theory & Practice, 7(2), 655-680.

Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Assessing metacognition in an online community of inquiry. Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 183-190.

Aşkar, P., & Mazman, S. G. (2013). Çevrimiçi bilgi arama stratejileri envanteri'nin türkçeye uyarlama çalışması . Eğitim ve Bilim, 38(168), 167-182.

Barrett, P.L. (2012). Information-seeking processes of fourth grade students using the internet for a school assignment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Columbia University.

Bendixen, L. D., & Hartley, K. (2003). Successful learning with hypermedia: The role of epistemological beliefs and metacognitive awareness. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28(1), 15-30.

Blummer, B., & Kenton, J. M. (2014). Education students' information seeking to support problem solving. In, Blummer, & Kenton (Eds) Improving student information search: A metacognitive approach. Chandos Publishing.

Bowler, L. (2010). A taxonomy of adolescent metacognitive knowledge during the information search process. Library & Information Science Research, 32(1), 27-42.

Bromme, R., Pieschl, S., & Stahl, E. (2010). Epistemological beliefs are standards for adaptive learning: A functional theory about epistemological beliefs and metacognition. Metacognition and Learning, 5(1), 7-26.

Case, D.O. (2002). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs and behavior. Amsterdam, NL: Academic Press.

Cesur, E. G. (2013). Uyarlanabilir öğretimin kaybolma ve bilişsel yüklenmeye etkisinin öğrencilerin bilişsel stilleri açısından incelenmesi. Unpublished master's thesis. Ankara University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.

Chiu, Y. L., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Internet-specific epistemic beliefs and self-regulated learning in online academic information searching. Metacognition and Learning, 8(3), 235-260.

De Bruin, A. B., & Van Gog, T. (2012). Improving self-monitoring and self-regulation: From cognitive psychology to the classroom. Learning and Instruction, 22(4), 245-252.

Fidel, R., Davies, R. K., Douglass, M. H., Holder, J. K., Hopkins, C. J., Kushner, E. J., Miyagishima, B. K., & Toney, C. D. (1999). A visit to the information mall: Web searching behavior of high school students. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(1), 24-37.

Griffths, J. R., & Brophy, P. (2005). Student searching behavior and the web: Use of academic resources and Google. Library Trends, 53(4), 539-554.

Hartley, K. (2003). The use of comprehension aids in a hypermedia environment: Investigating the impact of metacognitive awareness and epistemological beliefs. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12(3), 275-289.

Hartman, H. (1998). Metacognition in teaching and learning: an introduction. Instructional Science, 26, 1-3.

Hartman, H. J. (2001). Metacognition in learning and instruction: Theory, research and practice (Vol. 19). Springer Science & Business Media.

Hill, J. R. (1999). A conceptual framework for understanding information seeking in open-ended information systems. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(1), 5-27.

Hofer, B. K. (2004). Epistemological understanding as a metacognitive process: Thinking aloud during online searching. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 43-55.

Hsu, L. (2014). Online information seeking behavior: models of information source selection and information seeker satisfaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Colorado.

Kaya, S. (2012). Bilişsel ve üstbilişsel strateji etkinliklerinin öğretmen adaylarının öğretim tasarımı dersi başarılarına, bilişsel ve üstbilişsel stratejileri kullanma düzeylerine etkisi. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Gazi University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.

Kılıç Çakmak, E., Karaoğlan Yılmaz, F. G., & Yılmaz, R. (2015). İnternete yönelik epistemolojik inanç ölçeğinin uyarlama çalışması. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 5(1).

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75'86.

Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249.

Pengnate, S., & Antonenko, P. (2013). A multimethod evaluation of online trust and its interaction with metacognitive awareness: an emotional design perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29(9), 582-593.

Pintrich, P. R. (1995). Understanding self-regulated learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 63, 3-12.

Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The roal of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich ve M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 219-225.

Raes, A., Schellens, T., De Wever, B., & Vanderhoven, E. (2012). Scaffolding information problem solving in web-based collaborative inquiry learning. Computers & Education, 59(1), 82-94.

Rieh, S.Y. (2004). On the web at home: Information seeking and web searching in the home environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(8), 743-753.

Schacter, J., Chung, G., & Dorr, A. (1998). Children's internet searching on complex problems: performance and process analyses. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 840-849.

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475.

Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351-371.

Schraw, G. (2001). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. In Metacognition in learning and instruction (pp. 3-16). Springer Netherlands.

Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2008). Effects of the metacognitive computer-tool met.a.wareon the web search of laypersons. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 716'737.

Stahl, E., & Bromme, R. (2009). Not everybody needs help to seek help: Surprising effects of metacognitive instructions to foster help-seeking in an online learning environment. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1020'1028

Tsai, C.-C. (2001). A review and discussion of epistemological commitments, metacognition, and critical thinking with suggestions on their enhancement in Internet-assisted chemistry classrooms. Journal of Chemical Education, 78, 970'974.

Tsai, M. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2003). Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: The role of Internet self-efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(1), 43'50.

Tsai, M. J. (2009). Online Information Searching Strategy Inventory (OISSI): A quick version and a complete version. Computers & Education, 53(2), 473-483.

Walraven, A., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Boshuizen, H. (2008). Information-problem solving: A review of problems students encounter and instructional solutions. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 623-648.

Wilson, T. D. (2000). Human information behavior. Informing Science, 3(2), 49-55

Wu, Y.T. & Tsai, C.C.(2007). Developing an information commitment survey for assessing students' web information searching strategies and evaluative standards for web materials. Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 120-132.

Yalçınalp, S. &Aşkar, P. (2003). Öğrencilerin bilgi arama amacıyla interneti kullanım biçimlerinin incelenmesi. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(4), 100-107.

Yıldırım, A. &Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri (8.Ed.). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

Yılmaz, R. (2014). Çevrimiçi öğrenmede etkileşim ortamının ve üstbilişsel rehberliğin akademik başarı, üstbilişsel farkındalık ve işlemsel uzaklığa etkisi. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Ankara University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.

Yılmaz, R.& Kılıç Çakmak, E. (2012). Educational interface agents as social models to influence learner achievement, attitude and retention of learning. Computers & Education, 59(2), 828-838.

Yurdakul, B. (2004). Yapılandırmacı öğrenme yaklaşımının öğrenenlerin problem çözme becerilerine, bilişötesi farkındalık ve derse yönelik tutum düzeylerine etkisi ile öğrenme sürecine katkıları. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Hacettepe University, Institute of Social Sciences , Ankara.

Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3-7.

Published
2016-11-13
How to Cite
Karaoğlan Yılmaz, F. G. (2016). The relationship between metacognitive awareness and online information searching strategies. Pegem Eğitim Ve Öğretim Dergisi, 6(4), 447-468. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2016.022